Gerry Talks...

You are here: Home / Archives for Scientology v. Armstrong

Scientology v. Armstrong

by

Scientology services, fast, loose and fake

On October 29, I received by Canada Post an envelope addressed to me from:

LAW OFFICE OF KENDRICK MOXON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3500 WEST OLIVE AVENUE, SUITE 300
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA 91505

The envelope contained a four-page document entitled “Application for and Renewal of Judgment” in the case of Scientology v. Armstrong, Marin Co. Superior Court case no. CV 021632.

Two pages were California court form EJ-190, which was signed by Moxon. One page was a proof of service of “Application For and Renewal of Judgment,” which was dated October 22, 2019, and also signed by Moxon. One page was what purports to be the “Judgment” in this case, dated February 19, 2010 and signed by Judge M. Lynn Duryee.

Moxon’s application specifies US $500.000.00 for the “Judgment,” $483,972.60 for “Interest after judgment,” and $30.00 for “Fee for filing renewal application,” for a total of $984,002.60.

I had never seen this “Judgment” previously nor did I know of its existence.

Moxon did not provide an email address on his application, so I called the telephone number he provided, got relayed to him, and asked for an email address. He wanted to know why. I told him I had never received the subject “Judgment,” which was attached to his “Application.” He gave me his email address and protested that the subject “Judgment” was served on me, a fact claim he made sound fishy.

I then emailed Moxon:

From: Gerry Armstrong
Sent: October 30, 2019 1:27 PM
To: ‘kmoxon@…com’
Subject: Scientology v. Armstrong, Marin SC CV 021632

Kendrick Moxon, Esq.
Law Office Of Kendrick
3500 West Olive Ave., Suite 300
Burbank, CA 91505

By email: kmoxon@…com

Re: Scientology v. Armstrong, Marin SC CV 021632

Dear Mr. Moxon:

As I mentioned just now, the 2010 “Judgment” in this case, which your attachment to your “Application For And Renewal Of Judgment” purports to be, was never served on me. I had never heard that a judgment was ever filed. I received no papers relating to this “judgment,” or anything filed with the court to obtain it. I have had the same postal address you are using since 2006.

Please immediately send me the “judgment” including your “proof” of service and whatever was sent to the court to obtain the “judgment,” or anything else from the court relating to this “judgment.”

Sincerely,

Gerry Armstrong
[address]

On October 31, I received by Canada Post an envelope from Moxon’s law office addressed to me containing a two-page document entitled “Notice of Renewal of Judgment,” court form EJ-195. One page was a proof of service of “Notice of Renewal of Judgment,” which was dated October 23, 2019 and signed by Moxon.

I emailed Moxon:

From: Gerry Armstrong
Sent: October 31, 2019 10:41 AM
To: kmoxon@…com
Subject: Scientology v. Armstrong, Marin SC CV 021632

Kendrick Moxon, Esq.
Law Office Of Kendrick Moxon
3500 West Olive Ave., Suite 300
Burbank, CA 91505

By email:  kmoxon@…com

Re: Scientology v. Armstrong, Marin SC CV 021632

Dear Mr. Moxon:

I have just received your “Notice of Renewal of Judgment.” There was, however, no “Application For And Renewal Of Judgment” attached.

California Rules of Court, rule 3.1900 “Notice of Renewal of Judgment” states:

A copy of the application for renewal of judgment must be physically or electronically attached to the notice of renewal of judgment required by Code of Civil Procedure section 683.160.

Please transmit to me a correct “Notice of Renewal of Judgment” with a correct “Proof of Service.”

Also, please advise me immediately if you intend to properly serve me, as I requested yesterday, with the 2010 “Judgment” in this case, and any application or other documents relating to this “judgment” that were filed with or transmitted to the court, and any documents relating to the judgment received from the court.

Sincerely,

Gerry Armstrong
[address]

Later on October 31, I received this email from Moxon:

From: Kendrick Moxon 
Sent: October 31, 2019 12:07 PM
To: Gerry Armstrong
Subject: RE: Scientology v. Armstrong, Marin SC CV 021632

Mr. Armstrong,

Everything filed was served upon you before filing. To alleviate your confusion, please find copies of all documents filed respecting renewal of the judgment, with court stamps.  The judgment is included there.

All other documents relating to the judgment and that litigation in 2004-2010 which I filed were contemporaneously served on you.

Kendrick Moxon

LAW OFFICE OF KENDRICK MOXON, PC
3500 West Olive Avenue, Suite 300
Burbank, CA 91505
(818) 827-7104
(818) 827-7114 (fax)
kmoxon@…com

This message and its attachments are sent from a law firm and may contain information that is confidential and protected by privilege from disclosure.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from printing, copying, forwarding or saving them. Please delete this message and notify the sender immediately.

Attached to Moxon’s email was a .pdf consisting of images of these documents in the order transmitted to me:

  1. “Notice of Renewal of Judgment” stamped “Received” by the Marin County Superior Court on October 25, 2019;
  2. Page 2 of Scientology’s “Application For And Renewal Of Judgment;”
  3. Page 1 of Scientology’s “Application For And Renewal Of Judgment,” stamped “Received” by the Marin County Superior Court on October 25, 2019;
  4. The purported subject “Judgment” filed February 19, 2010;
  5. Proof of service signed by Moxon dated October 22 for “Application For And Renewal Of Judgment;”
  6. “Memorandum of Costs After Judgment, Acknowledgment of Credit, and Declaration of Accrued Interest” signed and dated by Moxon October 24, 2019, and stamped “Received” by the Marin County Superior Court on October 25, 2019;
  7. Proof of service signed by Moxon dated October 24 for “Memorandum of Costs After Judgment, Acknowledgment of Credit, and Declaration of Accrued Interest.”

I emailed Moxon back:

From: Gerry Armstrong
Sent: October 31, 2019 12:50 PM
To: ‘Kendrick Moxon’
Subject: RE: Scientology v. Armstrong, Marin SC CV 021632

Dear Mr. Moxon:

Thank you.

Again, I never received any documents relating to the 2010 “judgment” until I received the one page you attached to your “Application For And Renewal Of Judgment” from those 2010 documents.

Please immediately transmit to me all the documents you did not serve on me after October 5, 2007 until present time, but claim you did, particularly the documents relating to the 2010 “judgment.”

Sincerely,

Gerry Armstrong
[address]

On November 1, I received by Canada Post an envelope from Moxon’s law office addressed to me containing a two-page document entitled “Memorandum of Costs After Judgment, Acknowledgment of Credit, and Declaration of Accrued Interest” signed by Moxon and dated October 24, 2019.

Also on November 1, I emailed the Marin Court Civil Division Clerk:

From: Gerry Armstrong 
Sent: November 1, 2019 12:35 PM
To: ‘civil@marincourt.org’
Cc: kmoxon@…com
Subject: Request for assistance –CV 021632

November 1, 2019

Marin County Superior Court
3501 Civic Center Drive
Civil Division, Room 113
San Rafael, California 94903
USA

By email:  civil@marincourt.org

Re: Scientology v. Armstrong, Marin Co. Superior Court case no. CV 021632

Dear Civil Court Clerk:

I am the defendant in this case. I am in propria persona, in forma pauperis and in Canada.

On October 29, 2019, I received by Canada post an envelope containing a document entitled “Application for and Renewal of Judgment” signed by plaintiff Scientology organization’s attorney of record Kendrick Moxon, to which was attached a document purporting to be a “Judgment” filed in this case February 19, 2010.

I had never seen this “Judgment” or knew of its existence previously.

Since receiving these documents, I have asked Mr. Moxon, once by telephone and three times by email, to please transmit to me the February 19, 2010 “Judgment” in the case and any application or other documents relating to this “judgment” that were filed with the court, transmitted to the court, or transmitted from the court. So far, Mr. Moxon has refused to properly serve these documents on me.

Consequently, I am requesting the Court Clerk to please transmit to me a copy of these documents.

I have had the same postal address below since 2006. I have had the same telephone number below since 2004. I have had the same email address below since 2002. Plaintiff Scientologists and their attorneys have had these addresses and phone number since I obtained them. The Marin Court has also had these contact data for me.

Because the subject unserved documents include the purported judgment in the case, this request is very important and rather urgent.

The last CV 021632 document I received before three days ago was a court order dated October 5, 2007. So please let me know what documents are in the court’s files, particularly what documents surround the February 19, 2010 “Judgment.” And please let me know how I can obtain these documents.

Thank you for your anticipated assistance.

Sincerely,

Gerry Armstrong
[address]

Cc: Kendrick Moxon, Esq. by email

Notes:

  1. Why the Scientologists waited over two years to file their “judgment” is not known, but understandable. They similarly hid the appeal in Armstrong 1 (Los Angeles Superior Court case no. C420153) for three years.
  2. The Scientologists had an undeniable motivation to not serve me with what gives every appearance of being an appealable final judgment.
  3. At a quick review, many of the necessary facts, grounds and arguments to invalidate the “judgment” have already been laid out in my Respondent’s Brief in an appeal the Scientologists took from an earlier, similar, but unfinal “judgment.”
  4. The Scientologists’ appeal was obviously premature. In any case they dismissed it without filing a reply brief and prior to any substantive court ruling in the appeal.
  5. Note Moxon’s address in the February 19, 2010 “judgment:”

Kendrick Moxon, SBN 128240
MOXON & KOBRIN
3055 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 900
Los Angeles, CA 90010

I have never received a notification of change of address from Moxon, the attorney of record in this case.

  1. I am not ignoring the condition of truth and justice in the California and the US justice systems. I am aware that the Scientologists and their lawyers’ have connections into high offices and benches. I am very aware of the Scientologists and their lawyers’ policy and history of dishonesty, and of their overarching hatred for me that justifies ruining me, injuring me, tricking, suing, lying to or destroying me. I know that the Scientologists and their hired professionals’ conspiracy, including using the courts, to silence me about my religious beliefs, experiences or knowledge, or destroy me if I won’t be silenced, is by US law unlawful, and by God’s Law satanic. That is why, with little hope for human justice, I nevertheless ask for it and afford the courts, and the Scientologists, the opportunity to do the just thing.

 

by

Why won’t Marty and Mike tell the truth?

(Responding to a post by BTs2Free) You asked the real question, “Why won’t Marty and Mike tell the truth?”

Caroline’s LFBD F/N item was: because the truth would set a lot of people free, and it serves their purposes to keep people trapped. I think that’s a pretty good answer, well supported with known wisdom or knowledge, history and current facts.

Marty and Mike have spent their adult lives using Scientology to prevent Scientologists, and wogs, from being set free. Marty and Mike also spent those years using Scientology to victimize people who would set free entrapped Scientologists or wogs by telling them the truth. Their life’s work has required of Marty and Mike virtually constant lying, and even criminal behavior toward their victims.

The universal desire, effort, postulate of Scientologists is to have lies be true. This is the essence and goal of the left hand path, and any ‘ologies, ‘isms or ‘ics on that path.

Hubbard represented this in Scientology, as you know, by “8-8008,” here truthfully restated: the attainment of infinity, that is the first eight, is achieved by the reduction of infinity, or all that is real or true, that is the second eight, to zero, which is the first zero and the building of one’s own zero, or nothingness, illusion or lie, from zero to an infinity, or what is real or true, and by that one achieves the attainment of infinity. (Ref. 9ACC 14, 5412CM24, from Scientology’s Technical Dictionary)

One of the first points of programming to “achieve this attainment” is the law that it is carefully observed that the science of Scientology does not intrude into the Dynamic of the Supreme Being. (Fundamentals of Thought) That is the dynamic of infinity, the dynamic of everything, the dynamic of everything’s cause. Scientologists with a clue learn that law extremely early in their indoctrination.

The dynamics do not have the reality Scientologists give them, and can easily be demonstrated as serving malignant narcissists. Scientologists certainly use them to make themselves right and the 8-dynamicless masses, us wogs, wrong, and they justify diabolical behavior as “ethical” with their dynamics. They do all sorts of things to make their dynamics true, but their dynamics are untrue. Everything, on the other hand, where Scientologists are prohibited by Scientology from intruding, cannot but be real and true.

Scientologists know they must not intrude into, or look to, everything – infinity, their 8th Dynamic – for guidance or wisdom in their ethics, their choices or their lives. What they must look to for guidance or wisdom is what is not included in everything, or infinity. And what is not included in everything is nothing, or illusions or lies. By making what is essentially nothing or illusion their guide or source of their wisdom, Scientologists achieve the attainment of building zero into infinity. They don’t achieve anything, of course, everything remains everything, infinity remains infinity, and zero remains zero.

Scientology’s “axioms,” wildly vaunted by Scientologists as proof of their cult or philosophy’s truth and scientificalness, also direct and manipulate their thoughts and actions, and serve their universal postulate. Axiom 35, for example, states:

THE ULTIMATE TRUTH IS A STATIC. A Static has no mass, meaning, mobility, no wave-length, no time, no location in space, no space. This has the technical name of “Basic Truth.”

http://www.bonafidescientology.org/Append/01/page16.htm

It is a common “understanding” of sociopaths that truth has no meaning. And the reality is that the ultimate truth has all the meaning in the world.

You’re undoubtedly very familiar with the law in axiom 38 that “anything, to persist, must contain a lie.” This serves Scientology and Scientologists’ universal postulate and sociopathic purposes in two ways. Psycho-philosophically, it justifies their relentless lying about their cult and its founder, since they want Scientology to persist, or keep working. Scientologists are terrified that if they tell the truth about Scientology it will as-is and disappear. Conversely, Scientologists can all “righteously” black PR the people telling the truth about Scientology as liars because the cult is still here and persisting. It is axiomatic to Scientologists that people are lying about their cult because it hasn’t disappeared.

Scientologists constantly program and reprogram themselves with their universal postulate when they proclaim and swear that what’s true is what’s true for them. The only things that can be true for them that are not already true are lies.

The universal Scientology postulate of having lies be true degenerates into the postulate to have some lies be true, or to have even one lie be true. This hopeless postulate, I’m sure you noticed, degenerates into the endless effort to get others to agree that a lie is true. By that agreement, Scientologists postulate and agree, they create reality, that is, they make a lie true. Thank God, of course, they don’t.

The effort you observe by Marty and Mike to rewrite or whitewash Hubbard’s and Scientology’s history is the organized execution of Scientology and Scientologists’ universal postulate to have lies be true, or at least get them believed as true. The acceptance of Scientology and its founder remains Marty and Mike’s “purpose” and “valuable final product,” and this can only be achieved by getting people to believe lies about Scientology and its founder.

Both for personal and legal, as well as psycho-philosophical and conscience-based reasons, I want the truth being true. Actually, I know the truth is true, and don’t have to want it or postulate it. This is an essence of the right foot path.

Pretended belief in the truth of a lie is indispensable to keeping Scientology working, and keeping others keeping Scientology working. Marty, Mike and Miscavige share sets of identical lies they all say are the truth: “Scientology works,” “L. Ron Hubbard discovered the only thing that works,” “plus he was a war hero with purple hearts,” “auditing raises IQ a point per hour on average,” “Clear is a state beyond anything man ever before achieved,” “it’s an evolutionary leap called Homo novis,” “OT is even better,” “we’re at cause over matter, energy, space, time, thought, life, you name it,” etc. These and thousands of similar and supporting lies, of course, are used to lure in, keep in, enslave and rip off human beings exactly like us.

Another set of lies that Marty, Mike and Miscavige share and say are true concern Scientology’s wog victims. Marty, Mike and Miscavige all proclaim Hubbard’s Suppressive Person doctrine true, good and knowledge they want others to have, when in fact the doctrine is utterly false, utterly evil and utterly indefensible by anything but more lying, which is no real defense at all.

Marty, Mike and Miscavige all share the lie that SPs are criminal and destructive, when in truth SPs are good people who speak the truth about Scientology despite the hatred and abuse heaped on them by Marty, Mike, Miscavige, et al. Marty, Mike and Miscavige share the same doctrine and system for creating enemies and justifying their attack and pursuit. Marty, Mike and Miscavige also share the same set of enemies, the people they all call haters or worse, the people who tell the truth that might set their underlings and supporters and even themselves free.

Marty, Mike and Miscavige share the identical black propaganda on me, and the same postulate to have their lies about me be true. They’ve worked for years in their adult lives to have me criminally prosecuted on their false charges and even imprisoned so their lie that I’m a criminal becomes true. They degrade my image to beast level to make their lies that I’m degraded true, and to render praiseworthy the campaign to destroy me. They have had me physically assaulted, terrorized, threatened with assassination, bankrupted and in countless ways bullied, to stop me from telling the truth.

Because of the nature of the activity of postulating and working to have lies be true, Scientologists, in accordance with a parallel postulate, appoint people who tell the truth their executioners. Hubbard, as you know, wrote in his famous bulletin “What Is Greatness?”

There are those who appoint one their executioners. Sometimes, for the sake of safety of others, it is necessary to act. But it is not necessary to also hate them.

Because of the intensity and massive scope of Scientology and Scientologists’ thirty year war to have their lies about me be true, and because I engage the Scientologists in the psycho-philosophic zone plus the legal zone, where lies and truth are unavoidable issues, they have appointed me virtually every Scientologist’s executioner.

How great is that? Or, isn’t that just great!

Marty, Mike and Miscavige actually contracted virtually every Scientologist to appoint me their executioner when they identified and listed the Scientologists as beneficiaries in the 1986 Scientology v. Armstrong contract. Marty, Mike and Miscavige then imposed the criminal-executioner appointment and relationship even more emphatically on Scientologists by listing them again as beneficiaries in their unconscionable and unlawful injunction in 1995. “All Scientology and Scientology affiliated Churches, organizations and entities, and their officers, directors, agents, representatives, employees, volunteers, successors, assigns and legal counsel.” The Freezone. Ron’s Org, the Indies, are all Scientology entities. Along with their officers, directors, agents, representatives, employees, volunteers, successors, assigns and legal counsel they are all beneficiaries, and all have appointed me their executioner.

People with consciences who tell the truth don’t wish for or welcome anyone, let alone a whole army or navy, appointing them their executioner. I certainly have done what I could to get them to withdraw this insane appointment they’ve made, other than stop telling the truth that is. Once a person has told the truth for a while, I think stopping is virtually impossible, but it seems that that is all the Scientologists will accept to end the endless executioner appointing.

I’ve written to Scientologists and Scientology orgs or entities around the world, beseeching them to remove themselves as beneficiaries, and of course as appointers of me as their executioner, but none have responded. I provided a “Beneficiary Removal Form”.

I wrote to cult head Miscavige — and this a matter in every way of RTC concern, — and implored him to remove himself and his underlings as beneficiaries.

I’ve written Scientology’s attorneys, who are also beneficiaries.

I wrote Tom Cruise, who is DM’s most important underling, and reported best friend.

Despite Cruise’s star status, and despite whatever his friendship with DM is, DM made Cruise a beneficiary in the unlawful and disgusting Scientology v. Armstrong injunction, and had Cruise appoint me as his executioner.

“What Is Greatness?” was significant to me inside the cult, and I’m sure to many Scientologists. (Scientology site: What is Greatness?) It’s dated March, 1966, which was when Hubbard started the GO, or at least published HCOPL 1 March 1966 “The Guardian.” I think I hung onto “What Is Greatness?” enough that it might have shown up in my ethics file or pc folders, because there were early Internet attacks on me using “What Is Greatness?” as a button on me.

I had a friend, a very smart professional, who said to me, not long after Hubbard’s death, and quite seriously, “You killed him, Gerry.” Of course I hadn’t. All I had done was tell the truth about things that needed the truth told about them when there was the opportunity to tell it. I could see, however, where, following the Breckenridge decision, following his failed ops to silence me, and in the grip of long term malignant narcissism, Hubbard could have seen me as the executioner he’d appointed. He couldn’t come out of hiding, the Scientology v. Armstrong judgment in LA identified him as virtually a pathological liar, and the criminal division of the IRS was using the judgment and case documents to go after him and the organization.

My career as an appointed executioner should have ended there, but DM then appointed me his executioner. He must have thought the truth was killing him, and he went to extremes to suppress it and silence the people telling it. He committed and got others to commit countless pettinesses and crimes to appoint me their executioner.

Marty spent his years in the Sea Org with me as his appointed executioner, and over the past couple of years has newly appointed me his executioner.

Appointing me as their executioner must mean Scientology’s myriad beneficiaries are feeling something different from great, I guess. Postulating me as executioner imputes to me the evilest of intentions toward them and a threat to their dynamics, which means their “eternity.” I’m a living threat to their universal postulate to have lies be true. Their willingness to fight back was triggered a generation ago and we have been at war ever since.

Scientologists war on me because I tell the truth. Yet telling the truth is the only real hope I have to end the war. I want their war on me and persons acting in concert with me to be over, because it’s time, although it always was time. Ending their war is as easy for the Scientologists as not appointing anyone their executioners.

by

Gerry Armstrong’s Legal Archive

Introduction

Latest Lawsuit: Armstrong VII [ Appeal ]

Complaint Report to US DOJ

Armstrong I

CSC v Gerald Armstrong
Los Angeles Superior Court No. C 420153 (Conversion)
[Go to archive]

Key Documents:
Mutual Release & Settlement Agreement 12-06-1986
Breckenridge Decision Filed 06-22-1984

Appeals
Note: Court of Appeal Combined Case Nos. B025920 and B038975.
283 Cal.Rptr. 917

Armstrong II *

CSI v Gerald Armstrong
Marin Superior Court No. 152229/LASC No. BC 052395 (Breach of Contract)

Key Documents
Verified Second Amended Complaint Filed 04-05-1994

[Go to archive]

Armstrong III *

CSI v Gerald Armstrong
Los Angeles Superior Court No. BC 084462 (Breach of Contract)

Armstrong IV *

CSI v Gerald Armstrong
Marin Superior Court No. 157680 (Fraudulent Conveyances; Conspiracy; Damages)

Key Documents:
Order of Contempt 07-13-2001
Bench Warrant (Civil) 05-15-1998
Second Order of Contempt 02-20-1998
Bench Warrant (Civil) 08-06-1997
Order of Contempt 06-05-1997
Judgment 05-02-1996
Order of Permanent Injunction 10-17-1995

Appeal
California Court of Appeal No. A075027, Marin SC No. 157680

* 10-06-1993: Armstrong II and III were consolidated.
09-12-1994: Armstrong II and III were consolidated with Armstrong IV
under Marin SC No. 157680.
All are now called Armstrong IV.

[Go to archive]

Armstrong V

Bankruptcy

Key Documents
Decision 02-16-1996

[Go to archive]

Armstrong VI

Armstrong v. Miscavige, et al. (Nevada)

Key Documents
Complaint Filed 11-24-1997
Declaration Janet Holsclaw 06-12-1998

[Go to archive]

Armstrong VII

CSI v. Gerald Armstrong, Robert Minton, Lisa McPherson Trust
Marin Superior Court No. CV 021632
(Breach of Contract, Intentional Interference with Relations, Conspiracy)

Key Documents
Complaint 04-02-2002
Armstrong Answer 11-05-2002
Motion for Summary Judgment 11-13-2003
Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment 03-02-2004
Ruling re Motion for Summary Judgment 03-23-2004

Appeal California Court of Appeal No. A107100 Marin SC No. CV 021632

[Go to archive]

Armstrong VIII

Armstrong Complaint Report to U.S. Department of Justice

Key Documents
Declaration 03-27-2008
Complaint Report 02-16-2004

[Go to archive]

Other Scientology Litigation

[Go to archive]

Other Sworn Testimony

[Go to archive]

by

Open letter to Tom Cruise, Scientology v. Armstrong beneficiary

April 9, 2008

Dear Mr. Cruise:

As the putative second in command of the Scientology religion or organization, and as ecclesiastical head David Miscavige’s best friend, or vice versa, you are very aware of who I am. You are also aware of the Scientology v. Gerry Armstrong contract and injunction, and you are aware of the actions to enforce them over the past many years.

You cannot but know that you have been a beneficiary in the contract and injunction since the first time you volunteered years ago to do anything for any Scientology or Scientology affiliated church, organization or entity. According to the Morton biography, your volunteerism starts in the late 1980’s, not long after Mr. Miscavige mocked up the Scientology v. Armstrong contract and made volunteers beneficiaries.

If Scientologists aren’t being forced to do whatever they do in Scientology, as opposed, for example, to Scientologist RPF assignees who are forced to do the RPF, then the unforced Scientologists are volunteers. If the volunteers get paid, they become another beneficiary category, for example “employees.” The Miscavige regimers, who concocted the contract and injunction, don’t always immediately inform volunteers that they have become beneficiaries, because the purpose of these documents or fatwas is so blatantly evil.

The purpose, as I keep pointing out, without rational argument or disagreement from any beneficiaries, is the suppression and destruction of basic human rights. Very probably the regimers didn’t tell you, when you began doing whatever you’ve done voluntarily in Scientology, that you had also been made such a beneficiary to such evil.

You are now, of course, a representative and a de facto agent, which are two other beneficiary categories. “Ambassador” is not a specific Scientology v. Armstrong beneficiary category, but is included in the more embracive beneficiary category of “representative,” even within the OT Ambassadors’ definition for yourselves. Your wife Katie Holmes should be told that she is a beneficiary.

Last week, I wrote a letter to all the beneficiaries requesting that you all remove yourself as beneficiaries in the contract and injunction and the enforcement efforts. I have even provided a Beneficiary Removal Form to facilitate the beneficiary removal process. The purpose of this letter is to ask you to remove yourself as a beneficiary.

I have also written today to Mr. Miscavige as beneficiary head to urge him to come to his senses and stop contracting all the beneficiaries, you included, to the global suppression and destruction of basic human rights. As I mentioned, he has tried to prevent many beneficiaries from finding out they’re beneficiaries. I’m sure you would agree that he would never be so uncompassionate, however, that he would stop you, especially since you’ve become his best friend, or vice versa, and his number two in Scientology, from finding out you’re a beneficiary.

Because of your intimate relationship with Mr. Miscavige, and because of your statements I know of that have been made public, I can only conclude that you are a beneficiary at cause. You causatively seek the benefits being a beneficiary confers on you, which are specifically the suppression and destruction of my basic human rights specifically, and potentially everyone’s human rights. You are not a spectator, and have even asserted that you had cancelled spectatorism in your area.

Because the Scientology v. Armstrong contract and injunction and enforcement efforts bind all the beneficiaries to deprive their victims of their human rights in violation of US civil rights criminal statutes and international human rights charters, the beneficiaries, including you, comprise a criminal conspiracy. Because you are aware you are a beneficiary, and causatively support and seek the suppression and destruction of human rights, I conclude you are a criminal at cause, which is the state of OT.

Even though Mr. Miscavige, you, certainly all your fellow OTs in the world, and your fellow Miscavige regimers, are at cause beneficiaries, your individual and joint intention, program and actions, to enforce the Scientology v. Armstrong contract and injunction and obtain those benefits, are total failures. These documents’ purpose of suppressing and destroying human rights is not just evil but also utterly miscarried and bootless. You do not even get the benefit that being a suppressor and destroyer of human rights often gains such suppressors and destroyers, the suppression and destruction of human rights. Thank God and thank everyone you fail to suppress or destroy that this is so.

You get to be known as a rich guy dramatizing the global and fascistic evil purpose of suppressing and destroying human rights, and failing. And it’s your intended victims, right now, here, in present time, who bring your intention, which is every beneficiary’s intention, into view and public consciousness. You are at the effect of me and every person on earth who would act in concert with me by not being suppressed or destroyed by you.

If you removed yourself as beneficiary, you really could cause something, because other beneficiaries, even celebrity Scientologist beneficiaries, could follow your example and remove themselves as beneficiaries. When all the beneficiaries remove themselves, Scientology’s evil purpose will disappear, or be erased. And those former at-cause suppressors and destroyers of human rights will cause the extension and creation of human rights.

I’m not sure how best to get a letter to you, so I’ll make this an open letter and disseminate it as broadly as reasonable to make sure you get it.

Yours knowingly,

Gerry Armstrong
#2-46298 Yale Road
Chilliwack, B.C. V2P 2P6
Canada
604-703-1373

by

Letter to David Miscavige, head beneficiary in Scientology v. Armstrong

April 9, 2008

David Miscavige
Religious Technology Center
1710 Ivar Avenue, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, CA 90028 U.S.A.

Also by E-mail

Dear Mr. Miscavige:

As you know, a week ago I wrote, webbed and posted a letter to the beneficiaries in the Scientology v. Gerry Armstrong contract and injunction.

I mentioned in the letter that it was you and your regimers, as opposed to the majority of individual beneficiaries, who concocted the contract and the injunction and made all beneficiaries beneficiaries. I also said that you have prevented a number of beneficiaries certainly from finding out they’re beneficiaries.

You clearly do know that you yourself are a beneficiary and that all of the beneficiaries are beneficiaries. You also know the contract’s and the injunction’s purpose, and you know how evil that purpose is.

You want and seek to stop people from discovering the truth, of course, because the contract’s and injunction’s purpose is the global and wholesale suppression and destruction of basic human rights. You are brazen beyond bastards, but have not yet acquired enough power to openly proclaim what your real evil purpose is.

The Scientology v. Armstrong contract and injunction and the record of what you have done, and had your fellow beneficiaries do, to enforce these unconscionable fatwas expose your covert and cloaked, but nevertheless cult-wide, command intention. The words are written down and have been spread beyond any possibility of silencing, first by copiers and now by the Internet. You and your co-beneficiaries are all exposed, ethically and legally.

People around the world haven’t got it yet, because you’ve been somehow successful in preventing virtually everyone from getting it. You get it, because you could not possibly have squandered so much, worked so many years, and continue to risk so much, to stop all the wogs, as well as the beneficiaries, from getting it. Characteristic of criminals, you are trying to stop people from getting what you’ve got, from discovering what you’re source of.

Your regimers get it, because many of them are your attorneys or intelligence ops. Having got it, they dread the day when my attorney, or a US attorney, who’ve got it, gets the willful, or even some unwillful, beneficiaries in a deposition or on the stand. There is no way for you and all the beneficiaries on the planet to suppress or destroy the record. You and your regimers therefore have a terrible motivator to obliterate me. I’m writing as well then to try to get you, and your regimers, and all the beneficiaries, to change your motivators. Your individual and joint evil purposes of suppressing, destroying and obliterating good people can end when you remove yourselves as beneficiaries. These ev purps, moreover, cannot end for any beneficiaries unless you remove yourselves.

While I’m at it, I’ll again ask you to return the manuscript, art work, other documents and the briefcase you had stolen from my car. You could actually greatly alleviate your intention to suppress, destroy and obliterate me by returning all the things you’ve stolen from me. You of course have never wanted to alleviate your evil intentions toward me, so you have willfully kept my property all these years.

When exactly wogs world wide will get Scientology v. Armstrong is truly on God’s timetable, and is out of my hands. Some of it is still in your hands, however, because you can stop stopping everyone from getting anything at any time. You could even confess and announce and renounce what you’ve gotten. As I’ve said so many times before, however, I cannot expect you to do what is decent, in the same way that I would expect conscienceful people to do what’s decent, because you’re a sociopath. I also cannot expect any other beneficiaries to do what is decent as long as they are under your domination.

Nevertheless, it still makes sense to ask all the beneficiaries I can contact to remove themselves as beneficiaries. There is evidence that God has softened very hard hearts, even ones with OT obduracy. And I know there must be a remnant of benevolent and brave beneficiaries out there, and brainy enough to understand their situation and condition.

A number of wogs have a fairly good sense of the facts, in fact the abundance of facts, but still haven’t gotten Scientology v. Armstrong the way you get it. They haven’t spent all the years as you have, of course, conspiring to concoct and enforce the contract and injunction. You know these documents and the Scientology v. Armstrong war are key to the whole world getting your organization’s nature, doctrines, duplicity and threat. The case and the war also bring into focus your own individual and personal nature, doctrines, duplicity and threat, because you have run the litigation and the extra-litigation programs involving all beneficiaries over the last twenty-two years.

It’s impossible that the world will become aware that all your lies are true. That’s in fact why Scientology can never work – its lies, with every Scientologist postulator postulating together, will never be true. It is, however, possible that the world will become aware that all your lies are lies. It is impossible as well for you and all your fellow beneficiaries to suppress and destroy my record, but it is very possible that the world will become aware of your command intention to do so.

Now is the time for all beneficiaries, you included, to stop being beneficiaries of suppression and destruction, and to remove yourselves. Here’s a Beneficiary Removal Form to facilitate your removal.

Yours judiciously,

Gerry Armstrong
#2-46298 Yale Road
Chilliwack, B.C. V2P 2P6
Canada
604-703-1373

by

Letter to the Scientology v. Armstrong beneficiaries

To all Scientology and Scientology affiliated churches, organizations and entities, and all of their officers, directors, agents, representatives, employees, volunteers, successors, assigns and legal counsel:

As possible, I am writing each of you individually and personally, in addition to writing the Scientology and affiliated churches, organizations and entities, because you are all beneficiaries in the Scientology v. Gerry Armstrong contract and injunction.

You are also all responsible for the past and continuing judicial and extrajudicial efforts to enforce this contract and injunction against me and against others for your personal and joint benefit. The beneficiaries are also specifically identified here.

Some of you might not have been aware that you are beneficiaries. Scientology head David Miscavige and his regimers, who concocted the contract and the injunction and made you all beneficiaries, have doubtlessly worked to stop a great number of you from finding out that you are such beneficiaries.

Regardless of whether or not you know you are beneficiaries, however, being beneficiaries in the Scientology v. Armstrong contract and injunction makes you human rights suppressors and destroyers. It is what your fees and your labors buy.

All Scientology and affiliated churches, organizations and entities are also, by the Scientology v. Armstrong contract and injunction, human rights suppressors and destroyers.

I am writing to ask you to formally remove yourselves as beneficiaries in the Scientology v. Armstrong contract and injunction, and to formally remove your support from the campaign to use the contract and injunction or enforce them for anyone’s benefit.

The sole, inarguable purpose of the contractual clauses that you beneficiaries seek to enforce against me, and your sole purpose as beneficiaries for enforcing these clauses, is the suppression and destruction of my human rights. The sole, inarguable and unlawful purpose of the injunction is the suppression and destruction of human rights, including freedom of speech, freedom of association, due process, self defense, freedom from slavery, and most egregiously freedom of religion.

As the Scientology v. Armstrong contract and injunction and the unrelenting enforcement efforts over twenty-one years demonstrate, Scientology’s claims of defending and promoting human rights are willful lies. The contract and injunction demonstrate that the Scientology “Creed” is a litany of lies. You are all luring people into the Scientology religion and organization to become, whether you are aware of it or not, beneficiaries in the Scientology v. Armstrong war and suppressors and destroyers of human rights.

Please consider that your contractual, judicial and extrajudicial suppression and destruction of basic human rights in and with Scientology v. Armstrong includes not only my rights, but the rights of everyone who but acts in concert with me. Since everyone can in some way act in concert with me, and since I ask that they do and I make it so easy to do, you, as beneficiaries, are contracted to suppress and destroy the human rights of potentially everyone on earth.

It should be clear to the Scientologist beneficiaries that the Scientology v. Armstrong contract and injunction, and the effort you support to suppress and destroy others’ human rights, also suppress and destroy your individual and joint human rights. You are paying and working to make it lawful, and lawfully enforceable by the secular judicial system, to prevent anyone from speaking his conscience and expressing his religious beliefs about your individual and joint religion, Scientology.

Please discuss the beneficiary issue with your fellow beneficiaries, or with people you trust who are not beneficiaries. Please seriously consider your participation as a beneficiary in the Scientology v. Armstrong contract and injunction and in the judicial and extrajudicial efforts to enforce them. Please understand that, unless you are an attorney or agent who benefited monetarily from the creation and enforcement of the contract and injunction, the sole benefit being a beneficiary bestows on you is the suppression and destruction of basic human rights.

If you are a beneficiary in the Scientology v. Armstrong contract and injunction and you want to end your support for the suppression and destruction of human rights by being removed as a beneficiary please complete the Beneficiary Removal Form.

Gerry Armstrong
#2-46298 Yale Road
Chilliwack, B.C. V2P 2P6
Canada
604-703-1373
gerry@gerryarmstrong.org