On October 29, I received by Canada Post an envelope addressed to me from:
LAW OFFICE OF KENDRICK MOXON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3500 WEST OLIVE AVENUE, SUITE 300
BURBANK, CALIFORNIA 91505
The envelope contained a four-page document entitled “Application for and Renewal of Judgment” in the case of Scientology v. Armstrong, Marin Co. Superior Court case no. CV 021632.
Two pages were California court form EJ-190, which was signed by Moxon. One page was a proof of service of “Application For and Renewal of Judgment,” which was dated October 22, 2019, and also signed by Moxon. One page was what purports to be the “Judgment” in this case, dated February 19, 2010 and signed by Judge M. Lynn Duryee.
Moxon’s application specifies US $500.000.00 for the “Judgment,” $483,972.60 for “Interest after judgment,” and $30.00 for “Fee for filing renewal application,” for a total of $984,002.60.
I had never seen this “Judgment” previously nor did I know of its existence.
Moxon did not provide an email address on his application, so I called the telephone number he provided, got relayed to him, and asked for an email address. He wanted to know why. I told him I had never received the subject “Judgment,” which was attached to his “Application.” He gave me his email address and protested that the subject “Judgment” was served on me, a fact claim he made sound fishy.
I then emailed Moxon:
From: Gerry Armstrong
Sent: October 30, 2019 1:27 PM
To: ‘kmoxon@…com’
Subject: Scientology v. Armstrong, Marin SC CV 021632
Kendrick Moxon, Esq.
Law Office Of Kendrick
3500 West Olive Ave., Suite 300
Burbank, CA 91505
By email: kmoxon@…com
Re: Scientology v. Armstrong, Marin SC CV 021632
Dear Mr. Moxon:
As I mentioned just now, the 2010 “Judgment” in this case, which your attachment to your “Application For And Renewal Of Judgment” purports to be, was never served on me. I had never heard that a judgment was ever filed. I received no papers relating to this “judgment,” or anything filed with the court to obtain it. I have had the same postal address you are using since 2006.
Please immediately send me the “judgment” including your “proof” of service and whatever was sent to the court to obtain the “judgment,” or anything else from the court relating to this “judgment.”
Sincerely,
Gerry Armstrong
[address]
On October 31, I received by Canada Post an envelope from Moxon’s law office addressed to me containing a two-page document entitled “Notice of Renewal of Judgment,” court form EJ-195. One page was a proof of service of “Notice of Renewal of Judgment,” which was dated October 23, 2019 and signed by Moxon.
I emailed Moxon:
From: Gerry Armstrong
Sent: October 31, 2019 10:41 AM
To: kmoxon@…com
Subject: Scientology v. Armstrong, Marin SC CV 021632
Kendrick Moxon, Esq.
Law Office Of Kendrick Moxon
3500 West Olive Ave., Suite 300
Burbank, CA 91505
By email: kmoxon@…com
Re: Scientology v. Armstrong, Marin SC CV 021632
Dear Mr. Moxon:
I have just received your “Notice of Renewal of Judgment.” There was, however, no “Application For And Renewal Of Judgment” attached.
California Rules of Court, rule 3.1900 “Notice of Renewal of Judgment” states:
A copy of the application for renewal of judgment must be physically or electronically attached to the notice of renewal of judgment required by Code of Civil Procedure section 683.160.
Please transmit to me a correct “Notice of Renewal of Judgment” with a correct “Proof of Service.”
Also, please advise me immediately if you intend to properly serve me, as I requested yesterday, with the 2010 “Judgment” in this case, and any application or other documents relating to this “judgment” that were filed with or transmitted to the court, and any documents relating to the judgment received from the court.
Sincerely,
Gerry Armstrong
[address]
Later on October 31, I received this email from Moxon:
From: Kendrick Moxon
Sent: October 31, 2019 12:07 PM
To: Gerry Armstrong
Subject: RE: Scientology v. Armstrong, Marin SC CV 021632
Mr. Armstrong,
Everything filed was served upon you before filing. To alleviate your confusion, please find copies of all documents filed respecting renewal of the judgment, with court stamps. The judgment is included there.
All other documents relating to the judgment and that litigation in 2004-2010 which I filed were contemporaneously served on you.
Kendrick Moxon
LAW OFFICE OF KENDRICK MOXON, PC
3500 West Olive Avenue, Suite 300
Burbank, CA 91505
(818) 827-7104
(818) 827-7114 (fax)
kmoxon@…com
This message and its attachments are sent from a law firm and may contain information that is confidential and protected by privilege from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from printing, copying, forwarding or saving them. Please delete this message and notify the sender immediately.
Attached to Moxon’s email was a .pdf consisting of images of these documents in the order transmitted to me:
- “Notice of Renewal of Judgment” stamped “Received” by the Marin County Superior Court on October 25, 2019;
- Page 2 of Scientology’s “Application For And Renewal Of Judgment;”
- Page 1 of Scientology’s “Application For And Renewal Of Judgment,” stamped “Received” by the Marin County Superior Court on October 25, 2019;
- The purported subject “Judgment” filed February 19, 2010;
- Proof of service signed by Moxon dated October 22 for “Application For And Renewal Of Judgment;”
- “Memorandum of Costs After Judgment, Acknowledgment of Credit, and Declaration of Accrued Interest” signed and dated by Moxon October 24, 2019, and stamped “Received” by the Marin County Superior Court on October 25, 2019;
- Proof of service signed by Moxon dated October 24 for “Memorandum of Costs After Judgment, Acknowledgment of Credit, and Declaration of Accrued Interest.”
I emailed Moxon back:
From: Gerry Armstrong
Sent: October 31, 2019 12:50 PM
To: ‘Kendrick Moxon’
Subject: RE: Scientology v. Armstrong, Marin SC CV 021632
Dear Mr. Moxon:
Thank you.
Again, I never received any documents relating to the 2010 “judgment” until I received the one page you attached to your “Application For And Renewal Of Judgment” from those 2010 documents.
Please immediately transmit to me all the documents you did not serve on me after October 5, 2007 until present time, but claim you did, particularly the documents relating to the 2010 “judgment.”
Sincerely,
Gerry Armstrong
[address]
On November 1, I received by Canada Post an envelope from Moxon’s law office addressed to me containing a two-page document entitled “Memorandum of Costs After Judgment, Acknowledgment of Credit, and Declaration of Accrued Interest” signed by Moxon and dated October 24, 2019.
Also on November 1, I emailed the Marin Court Civil Division Clerk:
From: Gerry Armstrong
Sent: November 1, 2019 12:35 PM
To: ‘civil@marincourt.org’
Cc: kmoxon@…com
Subject: Request for assistance –CV 021632
November 1, 2019
Marin County Superior Court
3501 Civic Center Drive
Civil Division, Room 113
San Rafael, California 94903
USA
By email: civil@marincourt.org
Re: Scientology v. Armstrong, Marin Co. Superior Court case no. CV 021632
Dear Civil Court Clerk:
I am the defendant in this case. I am in propria persona, in forma pauperis and in Canada.
On October 29, 2019, I received by Canada post an envelope containing a document entitled “Application for and Renewal of Judgment” signed by plaintiff Scientology organization’s attorney of record Kendrick Moxon, to which was attached a document purporting to be a “Judgment” filed in this case February 19, 2010.
I had never seen this “Judgment” or knew of its existence previously.
Since receiving these documents, I have asked Mr. Moxon, once by telephone and three times by email, to please transmit to me the February 19, 2010 “Judgment” in the case and any application or other documents relating to this “judgment” that were filed with the court, transmitted to the court, or transmitted from the court. So far, Mr. Moxon has refused to properly serve these documents on me.
Consequently, I am requesting the Court Clerk to please transmit to me a copy of these documents.
I have had the same postal address below since 2006. I have had the same telephone number below since 2004. I have had the same email address below since 2002. Plaintiff Scientologists and their attorneys have had these addresses and phone number since I obtained them. The Marin Court has also had these contact data for me.
Because the subject unserved documents include the purported judgment in the case, this request is very important and rather urgent.
The last CV 021632 document I received before three days ago was a court order dated October 5, 2007. So please let me know what documents are in the court’s files, particularly what documents surround the February 19, 2010 “Judgment.” And please let me know how I can obtain these documents.
Thank you for your anticipated assistance.
Sincerely,
Gerry Armstrong
[address]
Cc: Kendrick Moxon, Esq. by email
Notes:
- Why the Scientologists waited over two years to file their “judgment” is not known, but understandable. They similarly hid the appeal in Armstrong 1 (Los Angeles Superior Court case no. C420153) for three years.
- The Scientologists had an undeniable motivation to not serve me with what gives every appearance of being an appealable final judgment.
- At a quick review, many of the necessary facts, grounds and arguments to invalidate the “judgment” have already been laid out in my Respondent’s Brief in an appeal the Scientologists took from an earlier, similar, but unfinal “judgment.”
- The Scientologists’ appeal was obviously premature. In any case they dismissed it without filing a reply brief and prior to any substantive court ruling in the appeal.
- Note Moxon’s address in the February 19, 2010 “judgment:”
Kendrick Moxon, SBN 128240
MOXON & KOBRIN
3055 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 900
Los Angeles, CA 90010
I have never received a notification of change of address from Moxon, the attorney of record in this case.
- I am not ignoring the condition of truth and justice in the California and the US justice systems. I am aware that the Scientologists and their lawyers’ have connections into high offices and benches. I am very aware of the Scientologists and their lawyers’ policy and history of dishonesty, and of their overarching hatred for me that justifies ruining me, injuring me, tricking, suing, lying to or destroying me. I know that the Scientologists and their hired professionals’ conspiracy, including using the courts, to silence me about my religious beliefs, experiences or knowledge, or destroy me if I won’t be silenced, is by US law unlawful, and by God’s Law satanic. That is why, with little hope for human justice, I nevertheless ask for it and afford the courts, and the Scientologists, the opportunity to do the just thing.