Dear Mr. Miscavige: In a recent article “1950 Shades of Pinks and Greys: Was L. Ron Hubbard Drugged Out When He Developed OT III?” published by your academic collaborator Massimo Introvigne, as I’m sure you know, one of your other collaborators Ian Camacho made the claim that asking your organization or you or your organization juniors to produce a certain letter would create for you, et al. a “lose-lose scenario.” Asking the Church of Scientology to produce a copy of the letter creates a … [Read more...] about To David Miscavige: Request for Production
Massimo Introvigne
L. Ron Hubbard’s Affirmations: Introvigne still bringing the darkness
Scientology cult collaborator Massimo Introvigne has published a new article “An Endless Controversy: L. Ron Hubbard’s “Affirmations,” which is free to read, parse and laugh or toss cookies at. [1. https://cesnur.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/tjoc_5_6_4_introvigne.pdf ] Introvigne pretends he has proven that: there is no evidence that [the Affirmations I posted in 2000] is anything more than a fake document written either by [me] or another anti-Scientologist, and not even a very bright … [Read more...] about L. Ron Hubbard’s Affirmations: Introvigne still bringing the darkness
Rum and pills of pink and grey
Camacho has signaled that he will not answer my requests for evidence supporting his fact statements in his black propaganda piece. (( https://cesnur.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/tjoc_5_4_1_camacho.pdf; https://gerryarmstrong.ca/a-rum-time-for-ron-in-old-town-las-palmas-part-1/ ; https://gerryarmstrong.ca/a-liar-walks-into-a-barrier/ )) It is the common and cowardly practice of Scientologists to not respond responsibly to legitimate challenges to their false claims or lies, but to ignore … [Read more...] about Rum and pills of pink and grey
The Double-Blindness, Deafness and Dumbness of Peer Reviewers
On July 15, I emailed Massimo Introvigne, the Editor and Publisher of The Journal of CESNUR, and cced Ian Camacho, the author of an article smearing me that Introvigne published: Dear Dr. Introvigne: You just published an article “1950 Shades of Pinks and Greys: Was L. Ron Hubbard Drugged Out When He Developed OT III?” by Ian C. Camacho. (( https://cesnur.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/tjoc_5_4_1_camacho.pdf )) Mr. Camacho states in his “Acknowledgements:” Major thanks go to Massimo … [Read more...] about The Double-Blindness, Deafness and Dumbness of Peer Reviewers
A Rum Time for Ron in Old Town Las Palmas (Part 1)
Dear Mr. Camacho: Re: Your article “1950 Shades of Pinks and Greys: Was L. Ron Hubbard Drugged Out When He Developed OT III?” (( “1950 Shades of Pinks and Greys: Was L. Ron Hubbard Drugged Out When He Developed OT III?” https://cesnur.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/tjoc_5_4_1_camacho.pdf )) I am grateful for your effort to school your readers on the legal term “burden of proof.” (The definition below is from my old Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Ed.) (( Burden of proof. (Lat. onus … [Read more...] about A Rum Time for Ron in Old Town Las Palmas (Part 1)
The Affirmations: What was L. Ron Hubbard thinking?
Recently, a person alerted me to some Facebook comments academic Scientology collaborator Massimo Introvigne had posted that mentioned me and my legal history with the Scientologists in relation to L. Ron Hubbard’s Affirmations. Another person then asked me if I could respond in some way. Since these are matters of public interest and controversy that have been written about for decades, and they occur within a greater public and legal controversy that also directly involves me, and for others … [Read more...] about The Affirmations: What was L. Ron Hubbard thinking?